Legal professional Normal Ken Paxton filed a movement Thursday evening to dam demise row inmate Robert Roberson from testifying on the Capitol on Friday within the newest escalation of a political battle between the chief department and a Texas Home committee over Roberson’s case.
The movement asks a district courtroom in Polk County — the place the jail that homes demise row is situated — to permit the state jail system to disregard a Texas Home committee’s subpoena ordering Roberson to seem in Austin for testimony.
Paxton wrote on social media that the submitting of the movement “robotically excuses” the Texas Division of Felony Justice from complying with the subpoena pending a listening to and determination of the movement.
The transfer is the most recent in a tense standoff between Paxton and a bipartisan group of Texas lawmakers who’ve sought to acquire Roberson’s in-person testimony for weeks, satisfied that the state authorized system has failed him.
Reps. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, and Jeff Leach, R-Plano, have accused the lawyer basic’s workplace of stonewalling the committee and slow-walking Roberson’s testimony till the panel robotically dissolves subsequent month with the beginning of the brand new legislative session.
Within the submitting, Paxton requested the courtroom to carry a listening to earlier than it decides whether or not to grant his movement. However he requested that the listening to not be set earlier than Jan. 13, 2025, saying he “can be overseas.”
The brand new legislative session begins — and the committee disbands — on Jan. 14.
“The lawyer basic’s workplace is aware of that and is making an attempt to delay till the beginning of the following session, which is simply horrifying and maddening to me,” Leach mentioned at an occasion with the Tribune on Dec. 6.
Members of the Texas Home Committee on Felony Jurisprudence had deliberate to listen to from Roberson at a listening to on Friday after serving the demise row inmate with a second subpoena this week.
In his movement, Paxton argued that the committee’s subpoena was “procedurally poor and overly burdensome,” making it obligatory for a courtroom to guard the Texas Division of Felony Justice from complying with the subpoena’s demand that the company transport Roberson to Austin.
Paxton argued that the subpoena was issued “in violation of the Home guidelines, the Structure and the Open Conferences Act.” He wrote that legislative subpoenas have to be permitted by two-thirds of a standing committee, and that nobody legislator can retain the facility to subject a subpoena on behalf of all the committee.
The nine-member prison jurisprudence committee had unanimously permitted a subpoena to Roberson in October, which compelled a keep of his scheduled execution and set off a authorized and political battle between the lawmakers and the chief department.
The committee didn’t reconvene to approve the second subpoena — making it invalid, Paxton argued.
The lawyer basic’s workplace additionally argued that the subpoena imposed an “undue burden” in requiring TDCJ to move Roberson to the Capitol, which the movement mentioned “poses vital security and safety dangers to the inmate, correctional employees and the general public.”
Paxton argued that Roberson’s circumstances posed a uniquely disproportionate problem for legislation enforcement, noting that his case has turn into “extremely publicized.”
“To mitigate these dangers even barely, TDCJ must dedicate considerably extra human and bodily sources to the transportation of this one inmate, at a considerably larger price than it in any other case would to move a complete roster of inmates,” the movement reads.
And Paxton accused lawmakers of misrepresenting their rationale for looking for Roberson’s testimony and violating the separation of powers by issuing a subpoena that “exceeds any permissible scope.”
Lawmakers have mentioned they imagine the courts will not be correctly making use of the state’s groundbreaking junk science legislation, which Roberson has tried unsuccessfully to make use of to overturn his conviction. Members of the committee mentioned they needed to listen to immediately from Roberson, who’s autistic, about his efforts to hunt justice beneath the legislation to interrogate its potential deficiencies.
However Paxton known as that reasoning “nakedly pretextual,” arguing that the committee’s “public statements go away little doubt that the true objective of this invited testimony is to relitigate the query of Roberson’s guilt or innocence.”
In a press release, Roberson’s lawyer, Gretchen Sween, argued that the lawyer basic’s workplace was “counting on baseless and imprecise smears and low-cost fear-mongering to justify an act seemingly with out authorized foundation.”
When Roberson’s execution was delayed in October, she mentioned, TDCJ officers had “made it clear to me personally that it might be no hassle in any respect to carry Robert to the Capitol. Then the OAG intervened.”
“The actual ‘worry’ at play right here appears to be that seeing and listening to from Robert will make it clear to the general public that an harmless man sits on demise row who can be a mild soul with a pronounced incapacity,” Sween mentioned. “Texans deserve higher.”
Moody and Leach, on the Tribune’s Dec. 6 occasion, vowed to proceed preventing for Roberson regardless of opposition from the lawyer basic’s workplace — and even via the beginning of a brand new legislative session.
“We won’t relent within the pursuit of justice for Mr. Roberson,” Leach mentioned. “In the event that they wish to thumb their nostril within the face of the Legislature that egregiously and blatantly, they are often — and needs to be — assured {that a} new committee subsequent session … will subject a brand new subpoena if we’ve to.”
This text initially appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2024/12/19/robert-roberson-ken-paxton-texas-house-testimony/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and fascinating Texans on state politics and coverage. Be taught extra at texastribune.org.
