AUSTIN, Texas — Texas lawmakers returned to Austin on Tuesday to start a 140-day session, throughout which the Republican-led Legislature is poised to cross an array of conservative priorities and determine the way to spend greater than 1 / 4 trillion {dollars} in state cash over the subsequent two years.
The session follows an election cycle that noticed Republicans keep agency management of each legislative chambers. However the social gathering is deeply fractured, with a management battle looming for management of the Texas Home that may form the subsequent 5 months of policymaking.
From debating faculty vouchers and enhancing the state’s water provide to reining in property taxes, the GOP-led physique will look to cross its conservative priorities amid preventing inside the social gathering.
Whoever is in cost, lawmakers will race to handle numerous key challenges earlier than the Legislature gavels out in early June, together with shoring up the state’s water provide and energy grid, addressing well being care and public faculty workforce shortages, and persevering with to rein in property taxes across the state.
A lot of the agenda will likely be pushed by GOP state leaders like Gov. Greg Abbott, who is continuous his push to enact training financial savings accounts, a voucher-like coverage that might give households direct entry to state funds they might use to cowl the price of non-public faculty tuition and different education-related bills. The concept can be a high precedence of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who presides over the Senate and can be vowing to ban all types of consumable tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, in Texas.
Because the Legislature reconvenes, listed here are some key points The Texas Tribune will likely be watching all through the session.
Who will likely be elected Home speaker?
Greater than a month has elapsed for the reason that Home’s present chief, Dade Phelan, deserted his bid for an additional time period wielding the speaker’s gavel. The race to succeed the Beaumont Republican has come down to 2 GOP candidates, neither of whom has secured sufficient public assist to lock up the speakership.
The speaker controls the destiny of laws by ruling on procedural issues on the Home flooring and putting in allies to guide committees that determine whether or not to advance payments or preserve them bottled up. With the management contest caught in limbo – a rarity this late within the recreation – members, lobbyists and advocates are heading into the session with no clear image of who will likely be pulling these key levers of energy.
Vying for the speakership is Rep. Dustin Burrows of Lubbock, a high Phelan ally who shortly emerged because the consensus decide of Phelan’s GOP management staff, together with a majority of Home Democrats. Battling Burrows for the gavel is Rep. David Cook dinner of Mansfield, who gained a closed-door vote in December to develop into the Home Republican Caucus’ endorsed candidate after a contingent of Burrows’ supporters exited the assembly.
Cook dinner is essentially backed by the Home’s most conservative members, whereas Burrows’ GOP assist stems largely from reasonable and institution Republicans. However the contest doesn’t fall neatly alongside ideological traces: Cook dinner’s voting report places him close to the ideological center of Home Republicans, firmly to the left of his hardline conservative supporters. In the meantime, even a few of Cook dinner’s supporters acknowledge that Burrows has strong conservative bona fides, displayed by his lead function in passing a sweeping new regulation in 2023 aimed toward sapping the ability of progressive native governments – a sore spot amongst some Democrats who’ve refused to get behind Burrows.
A lot of the battle comes right down to questions of power-sharing with Democrats and, for Cook dinner’s supporters, a need to wrest management from what they view as a cliquish management cadre shaped by Burrows, Phelan and their shut allies.
If elected, Cook dinner has vowed to weaken the speaker’s technique of controlling the chamber by supporting a two-term restrict on the place and barring the speaker from distributing “political funds.” Each are amongst a listing of calls for from hardline conservatives supporting Cook dinner, who has additionally agreed to make sure that GOP payments attain the ground earlier than any Democratic measures; make it tougher for Democrats to make use of procedural techniques to kill or delay conservative payments; and finish the custom of appointing Democrats to chair a choose variety of Home committees. Burrows has stated he would let the total Home determine whether or not to ban or proceed permitting Democratic chairs.
Additionally at stake within the speaker’s race are relations between the Home and Senate. Patrick – whose rift with Phelan stalled main objects like property tax cuts and border safety – has urged Home members to assist Cook dinner, setting the stage for continued sparring between the chambers if Burrows wins the gavel. Patrick has stated he doesn’t care who’s speaker “so long as they win with a big majority of Republicans,” although he has made clear his choice for Cook dinner, accusing Burrows and his allies of “desperately making an attempt to carry onto energy.”
Heading into Tuesday’s vote, Cook dinner remained caught shy of 60 public supporters, practically all of them Republicans. He has courted Democratic assist since successful the GOP caucus vote in early December however had didn’t web any public pledges till Rep. Richard Raymond, D-Laredo, introduced his assist for Cook dinner final week.
Burrows, in the meantime, introduced the backing of 76 present and incoming members – 38 Democrats and 38 Republicans – shortly after the December caucus vote, seeming to achieve a majority of the 150-member chamber. However just a few Republicans instantly requested for his or her names to be faraway from Burrows’ checklist, dropping his public assist beneath the wanted threshold. If each candidates stay in need of 76 votes, a 3rd candidate may emerge to hunt the gavel.
Personal faculty vouchers and public training funding
Two of the most important points on the desk this session are non-public faculty vouchers and a attainable funding enhance for public colleges. The 2 issues are deeply intertwined: although bipartisan majorities in each chambers supported a push to hike public training spending in 2023, the trouble died when lawmakers voted to strip vouchers from a broader training funding invoice, bringing down your entire package deal.
Since then, Abbott has led a well-funded coalition of voucher supporters who spent thousands and thousands in final 12 months’s primaries ousting Home Republicans who teamed with Democrats to sink the voucher plan. The governor claims to now have 79 “hardcore faculty selection proponents” within the Home – three greater than wanted to cross laws.
Nonetheless, some voucher foes argue that Abbott’s whip rely assumes backing from quite a few incoming Republicans who voiced basic assist on the marketing campaign path for “faculty selection” or training financial savings accounts however have by no means laid out what sort of voucher proposal they might again.
In a memo to members in November, Home Democratic Caucus leaders urged defiance, pointing to feedback made by pro-voucher Republicans acknowledging that the passage of voucher laws will not be a achieved deal but. The memo famous that, “like all invoice earlier than the Home, the satan is within the particulars.”
Nonetheless, Abbott has remodeled the political panorama round vouchers with astonishing velocity, and supporters are bullish that their success on the poll field generated sufficient momentum and political will to maintain members in line.
In the meantime, Abbott has stated he’s dedicated to climbing public faculty funding and trainer pay as nicely, portray it as a false option to counsel that “you may’t have each faculty selection and strong public colleges.” Voucher critics, nevertheless, argue that such packages would funnel cash away from public colleges, additional choking a system that’s already going through widespread finances shortfalls from inflation and 5 years with no important enhance in state funding.
How the state finances surplus will get used
Identical to in 2023, lawmakers must determine what to do with a multibillion-dollar finances surplus – and as soon as once more, there will likely be loads of competing pursuits vying for a share of the pie.
Comptroller Glenn Hegar estimated Monday that Texas can have practically $24 billion left in its state coffers when the present two-year finances cycle ends in August. Lawmakers can spend a few of the leftover money earlier than then or put it towards the upcoming finances that may run by August 2027. In addition they could depart some cash within the financial institution to keep away from busting state spending caps, as they did in 2023.
An enormous chunk of the excess may go towards public training. Elected leaders from each events are calling for a significant enhance in class funding, after the voucher conflict derailed efforts in 2023 to place $4 billion towards elevating trainer pay and giving colleges more cash per scholar. Lawmakers can have a second likelihood to faucet into that funding – which was included within the present state finances however stays unspent – and add extra on high if they need.
Funds leaders additionally must determine how a lot cash to place towards faculty vouchers if Abbott is ready to steer a package deal by the Legislature. The present finances units apart $500 million for a voucher program, which additionally stays untouched.
Additional competitors for surplus {dollars} will come from lawmakers and advocates who wish to renew objects they handed two years in the past. Water coverage consultants are pushing for the Legislature to ascertain a “devoted,” or ongoing, supply of funding to construct on the $1 billion authorised by lawmakers and voters to develop new water sources and repair crumbling infrastructure. Texas might want to spend greater than $150 billion over the subsequent half century to satisfy its rising water infrastructure wants, stated Jeremy Mazur, director of infrastructure and pure assets coverage for the nonprofit suppose tank Texas 2036. Abbott and different Republicans lately have signaled assist for main water spending this session.
Moreover, Abbott and Patrick have every stated they wish to cross one other spherical of property tax cuts this 12 months, after lawmakers in 2023 put practically $13 billion of that 12 months’s surplus towards a tax-cut package deal. The 2 Republican leaders even have referred to as for the Legislature to double funding for a $5 billion state fund aimed toward increasing the ability grid by providing low-interest loans for firms seeking to construct new gas-fueled energy vegetation.
Texas’ overflowing coffers even have allowed Republicans to pump greater than $11 billion into border safety since 2021 beneath the umbrella of Abbott’s Operation Lone Star initiative, by which a surge of state police and Nationwide Guard troops have been despatched to the border to apprehend folks suspected of crossing the border illegally and both flip them over to federal authorities or jail them on state fees.
Abbott has stated the huge expense is required to counteract the Biden administration’s immigration insurance policies, which Republicans have slammed as overly lenient. However with President-elect Donald Trump set to take workplace later this month and enact an immigration clampdown, Abbott and Patrick have signaled plans to redirect a few of the billions spent on border safety to different makes use of.
“We’re going to have the ability to take a whole lot of that cash now and put it again to our taxpayers, for roads, for water, for training, for well being care, for all of the issues that we’d like that Joe Biden compelled us to spend as a result of he was letting thousands and thousands of individuals cross the border,” Patrick stated in an interview with WFAA-TV in Dallas after the election.
Can Democrats current a united entrance?
Although Republicans management each legislative chambers and each statewide workplace in Texas, Democratic lawmakers have continued to wield some affect over the lawmaking course of – and the way the state spends its cash – by deploying parliamentary techniques to hinder GOP payments and chairing a handful of Home committees, together with panels overseeing components of the finances.
However within the Home – the chamber the place Democrats have their finest likelihood of blocking GOP priorities and shaping laws – the social gathering is contemporary off a divisive management battle that noticed Rep. Gene Wu of Houston supplant Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer of San Antonio as caucus chief.
The Home’s 62 Democrats – outnumbered by an 88-Republican majority – are actually heading into the session divided over the way to method the speaker’s race. Just a little greater than half the caucus is publicly backing Burrows, whereas a lot of the remaining members are withholding their assist for both candidate. Some uncommitted Democrats have held talks with Cook dinner, however solely Raymond, the Laredo Democrat, has introduced his assist.
Martinez Fischer, who’s among the many uncommitted members, penned a letter to fellow Democrats on Jan. 1 urging the caucus to get on the identical web page. He argued Burrows’ assist was shaky sufficient that Democrats may maintain out for a greater deal or candidate in the event that they stayed on the sidelines, directing his argument at Democrats who, he contended, have been supporting Burrows out of a misguided sense that “‘the practice was leaving the station’ and so they wanted to get on board.”
“In case you are one in all [those Democrats], you must actually think about becoming a member of these of us who will not be dedicated,” Martinez Fischer stated. “As we’ve got stated for months in our opposition to vouchers, our unity is our energy.”
Rep. James Talarico, an Austin Democrat who helps lead the social gathering’s voucher opposition within the decrease chamber, advised the Tribune in December he’s optimistic that Democrats will stay united in opposition to vouchers, as they have been in 2023.
“I do see a path the place there isn’t a voucher [bill] handed. I additionally see different paths of various methods this session may finish,” Talarico stated. “This recreation simply began, and there is a whole lot of clock left.”
Democrats can even search for leverage on Republican efforts to amend the Texas Structure, which require two-thirds assist in each chambers. After netting a seat within the Senate, Republicans will management 20 of the chamber’s 31 seats, only one vote shy of the two-thirds threshold. However within the Home, Republicans might want to carry 12 Democrats on board to cross constitutional amendments when each member is current – an impediment that has thwarted latest GOP priorities like a long-running effort to offer judges extra discretion to disclaim bail.
That measure, aimed toward maintaining extra defendants behind bars whereas awaiting trial, is set to be a precedence of Patrick and influential Republicans within the Senate, the place GOP bail legal guidelines have repeatedly sailed by in recent times.
Disclosure: Texas 2036 has been a monetary supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partially by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no function within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full checklist of them right here.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media group that informs Texans – and engages with them – about public coverage, politics, authorities and statewide points.
